Viaduct Foundation Design for Geohazards in Kicking Horse Canyon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Trans-Canada Highway passes through very steep terrain in the Kicking Horse Canyon east of Golden, BC, and a series of recent projects have improved and widened the highway through the region. Construction of the final and most technically challenging segment is now underway with the Kicking Horse Canyon Phase 4 design build project. The existing highway crosses a series of unstable slopes, active landslides, large ravines, and avalanche and rockfall paths. Key project goals were to improve the safety of the roadway and reduce geohazard risk. The required highway geometry combined with upslope geohazards and steep terrain required significant portion of the alignment to be constructed on the steep slopes below the existing highway which have marginal stability. The conventional solution for construction on steep slopes below the highway has been to support the highway on grade with downslope retaining walls, which are stabilized by piles below. When considering this option following completion of the geotechnical investigation for detailed design, it became apparent that due to a number of factors, including higher walls and deeper bedrock than expected, large diameter piles at very tight spacing would be required to meet project specifications for slope stability. These piles would be costly, time consuming to install, and there would be significant safety challenges associated with the heavy piling equipment required on the steep slopes for long durations. A bridge solution was therefore proposed to carry the roadway on structure over the unstable slopes. An innovative viaduct design was developed and was adopted for nine individual viaduct structures totaling over 1.8 km of highway length. The viaducts have regular 23 m spans with substructures consisting of precast concrete cap beams at each pier supported on three concrete-filled steel pipe piles drilled into bedrock. The highway is supported on the structures, and the piers were designed to resist the loading from slope movements, thus avoiding the need to stabilize the entire slope. There are no established design methodologies in geotechnical practice for design of piles embedded in a moving embankment, other than in seismic design for liquefiable soils. New methodologies were developed drawing on first principles and existing stabilization pile methodologies. Close coordination was required between the structural and geotechnical engineers to find solutions for a variety of different loading situations, ground slopes and below-ground bedrock surfaces, and an active landslide zone that was actively moving during construction. Other extreme loadings were also required to be defined and designed for including debris flow, rockfall, and avalanche impacts. This paper discusses the many design, loading, and constructability challenges faced in the foundation designs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".