MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392528914 · doi:10.1017/9781805430537.003

The Culture of the Wives: Life in the British Isles

2023· other· en· W4392528914 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenealogyGeographyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As Already Noted, Soldiers’ Wives in the first half of the nineteenth century were a lightning rod for criticism. Middle- and upper-class commentators frequently thought them rowdy, ignorant, prone to drunkenness, lacking necessary homemaking skills, and all too likely to fall into prostitution in the absence of their husbands. In short, as an article in the Morning Chronicle put it, they were a curse, contaminating all those around them. With the outbreak of the Crimean War in 1854, this view began to jostle uncomfortably with a second understanding: that soldiers’ wives were passive victims who simply could not cope in the absence of the patriarchal head of the family. While these stereotypes oscillated uncomfortably in the public mind during the second half of the nineteenth century, the extent to which either of them was borne out in reality is debatable. These women, moreover, had to negotiate the expectations and demands of two sets of authority: like their husbands they had to obey the regulations and orders of the army and its officers, but they were also wives in a society which expected men to head their households, to exercise authority over their spouses, and to provide for them. The authority soldiers could exert over their wives was diminished, however, by several factors. First, soldiers were often physically absent from their families, not just on extended service elsewhere, but also in the course of daily life. They were regularly not available to resolve quotidian problems and crises. Second, these men did not provide many of the basic necessities of life for their families; the army did. Housing in barracks, beds and bedding, food rations (in some circumstances), medical care (for part of the century) and clothing for men were all provided by the army, although it did deduct from soldiers’ pay for some of these benefits. In short, the army partially usurped the husband's role of provider for his family, although some soldiers at least saw the benefits on offer as part of the wages they earned, as will be seen. Third, soldiers’ very low pay and the many deductions to which it was subject also helped to weaken the husbands’ role of provider and forced army wives to take paid employment in order for the family to achieve subsistence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0230.011
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207