Phytosociological Study Of Herb Species At Two Reclaimed Sites Of Sukinda Chromite Mining Region Of Odisha, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Present study was carried out in the Chromite mining region of Sukinda, District Jajpur, Odisha. Two overburden dump sites were selected for vegetation analysis out of which one site was two year old and other 15 year old. Vegetation analysis was carried out on these sites to observe the differences in density of herb species after reclamation. The density was calculated for herb species at different aspects of these two dumps to find out the impact of aspect and age on density values of herbaceous vegetation on reclaimed over burden sites. Of the 58 and 56 herb species recorded at these reclaimed sites D2 and D7 respectively, 36 species were present at both sides. Higher number of species was recorded on east aspect at both the sites. Both the fifteen year and two year old sites was represented by 22 families. Herb species of family Poaceae, Amaranthaceae, Fabaceae and Asteraceae were the dominant families at D2 site where as families like Mimosaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Poaceae were more in number than other families at older site i.e. D7. Amaranthus viridis and Cynodon dactylon were theb dominant species on yonger site and Cynodon dactylon and Evolvulous nummularius exhibited dominance at older site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".