MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392577424 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-12404

Citizen-science approach to long-term observation of aquifer response to meteorological forcings

2024· preprint· en· W4392577424 on OpenAlexaffabout
Masaki Hayashi, Md Shihab Uddin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)AquiferClimatologyEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeologyGeographyGroundwaterGeotechnical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Groundwater provides more stable source of water supply, compared to surface water, in the areas that experience large fluctuations in dry/wet condition, such as semi-arid, continental regions of Africa, Asia, and Americas. These regions are characterized by decadal-scale variability in precipitation, which translates into variability in groundwater recharge rates. Depending on the balance between precipitation and evapotranspiration, these regions can have several consecutive years of no or little recharge, causing a substantial decline of aquifer storage. Therefore, it is important to have a dense network of observation wells to monitor the spatial and temporal variability in aquifer storage over a long term, particularly in regions with highly heterogeneous aquifers. Groundwater in a system of heterogeneous aquifers is disintegrated, meaning that a large number of wells are required to monitor the behavior of many individual aquifer units. This is in contrast to the surface water system integrated by the river network, which can be effectively monitored using a relatively small number of river-gauging stations. As an example, the Paskapoo Formation aquifer system in Alberta, Canada, consists of numerous small sandstone aquifer units encased in mudstone aquitards, resulting in highly heterogenous behavior of aquifer water levels over a distance of < 1000 m. A community-based groundwater monitoring network was initiated in the Rocky View County in 2007-2008 to monitor the response of the Paskapoo Formation aquifer to multi-decadal fluctuations in meteorological forcings. The county occupies ~4000 km2 of predominantly agricultural area under the semi-arid climate, where mean annual precipitation is 400-500 mm and annual potential evapotranspiration is 600-700 mm. A citizen-science approach is used, whereby community volunteers monitor their own wells and report their observation to university researchers. The groundwater monitoring network is part of a hydrological observatory including stream gauging stations and meteorological stations measuring precipitation and evapotranspiration fluxes. The long-term data collected at the observatory are used to demonstrate the effects of wet-dry cycles on soil moisture, groundwater storage, and stream flow; and to predict responses of aquifer storage to climate-change scenarios using numerical groundwater recharge models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change→French-language works237,207→