Influence of Surgeon's Expertise on the Duration of Approach and Closure during Osteosynthesis of Distal Radius Fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The aim of this study was to determine whether the duration of the approach (PII) and closure (PV) phases for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of distal radius fractures varied according to the surgeon's level of expertise. The main hypothesis was that the PII or PV duration was inversely proportional to the level of expertise. Materials and Methods The method measured the duration of PII and PV for 50 videos of MIPO operated by one surgeon with level 3E expertise, three with level 4E, and one with level 5E. The videos were viewed to identify any technical errors. Results The average PII duration was 3 minutes 8 seconds for level 5E, 4 minutes 7 seconds for 4E, and 6 minutes 19 seconds for 3E. Average PV duration was 2 minutes 12 seconds for level 5E, 2 minutes 36 seconds for 4E, and 2 minutes 41 seconds for 3E. The average duration of PII + PV was 5 minutes 20 seconds for level 5E, 6 minutes 37 seconds for 4E, and 9 minutes for 3E. These findings indicate that both PII and PV duration was the longest in the level 3E surgeons' practice. Six technical errors were identified for levels 3E and 4E during PII (hemostasis control, multiple incisions, instrument handling, improper use of the fluoroscope, time-outs) and PV (intradermal reattachment). Clinical Relevance The main hypothesis was verified since the duration of PII or PV was inversely proportional to the surgeon's level of expertise. This study identified technical errors in hand surgery practices of new surgeons. By early identification and correcting these minor errors, it would be possible to speed up the learning curve. We recommend surgical videos to be systematically recorded and analyzed to improve hand surgery practices. Type of Study/Level of Evidence Therapeutic/Level IIIa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".