MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392577473 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-12572

 Changes in erosion and sediment dynamics in a retreating world: high resolution provenance analysis from detrital apatite

2024· preprint· en· W4392577473 on OpenAlexaffabout
Scott Jess, Lindsay M. Schoenbohm, Eva Enkelmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvenanceSedimentErosionGeologyApatiteHigh resolutionOceanographyGeochemistryGeomorphologyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glacial retreat quickly and dramatically changes erosion dynamics across catchments. As ice retreats, newly exposed valley walls and sediment can become the target of hillslope and fluvial erosion that in turn can significantly increase sediment fluxes downstream. These increasing fluxes have important implications for hydropower generation and water quality, presenting risks to biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and human inhabitants. Determining where this new influx of sediment is derived from, and hence what parts of catchments are experiencing the greatest erosion, requires the ability to trace exactly where is sediment derived from in the catchment.Recent analytical advances in the dating of apatite have improved its utility as a provenance tool. The advent of LA-ICP-MS techniques now allow thermochronometric, geochronometric, and chemical data to be collected from each individual grains of a detrital sample. As such, we are able to trace sediment sources across a partially glaciated catchment based on lithology, and source-rock elevation. In this work, we collected samples across the Bugaboo Glacier catchment in western Canada, where ice has retreated >2 km in the last century. Detrital samples were collected from the outwash river and two moraine samples, coupled with a bedrock elevation profile. Bedrock samples encompass the catchment’s two principal lithologies, a Cretaceous granitic intrusion, and Neoproterozoic metasediments. Thermochronometric dates range from 41.4 Ma at the highest elevation to 23.9 Ma at the lowest, while geochronometric dates range 68.7–151.3 Ma in granites to 90.5–1952 Ma in metasediments. Supplementary chemical data also help to highlight key differences between the lithologies.Dates and chemistry from moraine samples show they are likely derived primarily from upstream granitic sources, while sample from the modern outwash river suggests a greater mixture of sources. Detrital mixture models and multi-dimensional scaling suggest moraine samples are composed of sediment derived from a wide range of elevations within the catchment, while the sediments of the modern outwash river appear to be derived entirely from erosion of these moraines, left exposed by retreating ice. This suggests the widely documented increase in sediment flux during glacial retreat is primarily driven by the erosion of newly exposed unconsolidated moraines in catchments. Moreover, this work helps to highlight how the analysis of detrital apatite can be harnessed to produce a highly accurate provenance tool in glacial catchments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→