The localized rotations in Junggar Block for the last 50 Myr: new paleomagnetic constraints 
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present an analysis of paleomagnetic data from Cenozoic sedimentary rocks of the northern Junggar Block in central Asia to assess if the northern Junggar Block has suffered vertical axis rotations with respect to stable Eurasia. Stepwise thermal demagnetizations isolated a stable high-temperature component of magnetization in most specimens, which we interpret as the primary magnetization from the positive reversal test. Based on high-resolution magnetostratigraphic studies (Zhang et al., 2007, 2012), we calculated the mean direction of each 5 Myrs of 44-30 Ma and 25-17 Ma covered by the sample age and yielded seven mean directions in 45-37.5 Ma, 40-35 Ma, 37.5-32.5 Ma, 35-30 Ma, 25-20 Ma, 22.5-17.5 Ma, respectively. The variation between the observed declination from the study area and the reference declination from Eurasia indicates that a local counterclockwise rotation of 18.8 ± 11.4° took place during 40±2.5 - 35±2.5 Ma. Together with the paleomagnetic data during 23-3.1 Ma in the southern part of the Junggar Basin (Charreau et al., 2005, 2009), it can be concluded that Junggar Block experienced local counterclockwise rotation with respect to the Eurasia in the piedmont of the north and south rim successively due to the strike-slip fault. At a larger scale, the blocks in the Central Asia Right–Slip Fault Zone have experienced tectonic rotation at different times under the far-field effect of India-Eurasia collision, that is, formed an overall counterclockwise vertical axis rotation mode of different stages because of strike-slip faulting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".