Observations of deep near-inertial internal waves in the Eurasian Basin.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Arctic Ocean has a less energetic internal wave climate than other oceans, mainly due to the thick sea ice cover which inhibits wind interaction with the surface. With the continued decrease in summer sea ice extent and the increase in seasonal ice-free areas, wind-driven internal waves, especially in the near-inertial range, are becoming more energetic. Coupled with the fact that most of the Arctic Ocean lies north of the critical latitude for semi-diurnal tides, the shift in ice dynamics implies an increase in the importance of near-inertial waves (NIW) for the internal wave climate. In particular, increased NIW amplitude and kinetic energy in the Canadian Basin and enhanced wind-driven vertical heat fluxes and dissipation rates in the Eurasian Basin have already been observed in the upper column. In the deep ocean beyond the critical latitude, NIWs are expected to drive mixing in the interior, but it is unclear to what extent. Here, we present innovative and unprecedented deep current observations from a mooring in the Gakkel Ridge in the Eurasian Basin at 82.53°N. The presence of barotropic diurnal and semi-diurnal tides and semi-diurnal harmonics enriches the complex interplay of internal waves. By comparing the observed downward and upward NIW kinetic energy with wind speed, sea ice properties and numerical simulations, we discuss the likely surface origin of the NIW. In particular, there is a lagged correlation of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".