The Ross-Konno Procedure With or Without Mitral Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review With Individual Data Pooling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The Ross-Konno procedure is a technically demanding surgical option to treat multilevel left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Methods: A systematic review with pooled analyses was conducted according to PRISMA criteria on studies published between January 2000 and May 2022 that assessed outcomes following the Ross-Konno intervention in children. Individual patient data were extracted from published Kaplan-Meier curves using digitalization software. Overall survival and freedom from reintervention were assessed by time-to-event approaches. Determinants of one-year survival were investigated by meta-regression analyses. Results: Ten studies with a total population of 274 patients were included. The overall pooled early (≤30 days) survival rate was 86.9% (95% CI [87.6%-78.4%]). Five-year survival rates in patients without and with (N = 50 [18.2%] of 274 total patients) concomitant mitral valve surgery were 82.5% (95% CI [87.6%-77.4%]) versus 56.1% (95% CI [74.1%-38.1%]), hazard ratio 2.67, 95% CI (1.44-4.93), P < .0001. Five- and ten-year freedom from pulmonary autograft reoperation rates were 93.5% and 90.9%, respectively. Five- and ten-year freedom from right ventricular outflow tract reoperation rates were 74.3% and 57.3%, respectively. By meta-regression analysis, resection of endocardial fibroelastosis (N = 32 [11.7%] of 274 total patients) was associated with superior one-year survival ( P = .027). Conclusion: The Ross-Konno procedure is associated with substantial early mortality and gradual attrition thereafter. Mortality is higher in patients with concomitant mitral valve surgery. Resection of endocardial fibroelastosis is associated with superior survival. Right ventricular outflow tract reinterventions are common.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".