Hippocampal amide proton transfer values are associated with cerebral small vessel disease imaging markers and total burden: a community-based cross-sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Neurodegeneration has been suggested to be associated with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). The association between different CSVD imaging markers and the extent of neurodegeneration could be indirectly confirmed by examining the relationship between CSVD imaging markers and the hippocampal amide proton transfer (APT) values. The associations between hippocampal APT values with CSVD imaging markers and CSVD total load need to be further validated. The aim of this study was to investigate potential variations in hippocampal APT values among individuals with CSVD imaging markers and varying degrees of CSVD total burden. Methods: A cross-sectional study (retrospective analysis of prospectively-acquired data) was conducted at Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. From May 2020 to June 2021, 165 individuals (age, 40–76 years; male/female, 103/62) were included in this study. The inclusion criteria for the participants were as follows: The presence of lacunar infarction (LI), and/or cerebral microbleed (CMB); moderate-to-severe enlarged perivascular space (EPVS) (>20); deep white matter hyperintensity (WMH) > Fazekas 2 or periventricular WMH > Fazekas. The exclusion criteria comprised the following: History of craniocerebral operation; Cases with significant pathology incidentally identified during magnetic resonance (MR) scan; Drug or alcohol abuse. The differences of hippocampal APT values between CSVD imaging makers presence or absence groups and different CSVD total burden groups were compared using independent t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The correlations between APT values and CSVD imaging markers were analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. A mediation analysis model was used to investigate the mediating effect of the hippocampal APT values in the association between CSVD total loads and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score was assessed. Results: The hippocampal APT values among different CSVD total load groups were significantly different (P<0.001). The hippocampal APT values were significantly different between the imaging markers presence and absence groups. The P values for the LI, WMH EPVS, and CMB presence or absence groups were <0.001, <0.001, 0.034, and 0.002, respectively. The hippocampal APT values were significantly correlated with CMB (P<0.01), LI (P<0.01) and WMH (P<0.01). The mediation models demonstrated that the APT values of the hippocampus partially mediated the association between CSVD total load and MoCA score, the proportion of mediation attributable was calculated as 17.50%. Conclusions: Hippocampal APT values were associated with CSVD imaging markers and total burden. Hippocampal APT values may serve as a biomarker for the early detection of neurodegeneration in CSVD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".