MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392595316 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-149

Quantifying permafrost organic carbon remineralization after redeposition on the ocean floor, using  δ13C and F14C.

2024· preprint· en· W4392595316 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manuel Ruben, Jens Hefter, Torben Gentz, Florence Schubotz, Bingbing Wei, Bo Liu, Michael Fritz, Anna Irrgang, Anabel von Jackowski, Walter Geibert, Gesine Mollenhauer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemineralisationPermafrostEnvironmental scienceTotal organic carbonCarbon fibersCarbon cycleEnvironmental chemistryOceanographyGeologyChemistryEcologyMaterials scienceBiologyEcosystemFluorideInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arctic permafrost is a critical global tipping element in a warming climate. Annually, the erosion of coastal permafrost discharges an estimated 5 to 14 Tg of organic carbon (OC) into the Arctic Ocean. Although this previously stored OC has the potential to be reintroduced into the atmosphere, thus accelerating human-induced climate change, little is known about the benthic remineralization processes of permafrost OC after erosion and redeposition on the ocean floor. Our research quantified fluxes of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and analyzed its isotopic composition of nearshore sediments in the Canadian Beaufort Sea, specifically off Herschel Island. Our findings showed a DIC release of 0.217 mmo/m²/d, with an average signature of δ13C = -22.44 ± 72 ‰ and F14C = 0.548 ± 0.007. Utilizing a model that combines two carbon isotopes, we estimate that approximately 38 ± 10% of the released DIC is a result of subsurface degradation of redeposited permafrost OC, with an additional 15 ± 12% originating from redeposited active layer OC. Additionally, isotopic endmember analysis was utilized on bacterial membrane lipids from live sedimentary bacteria to determine the relative utilization of OC sources in bacterial communities within shallow subsurface sediment (

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→