MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392598345 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2917

Evidence for the formation of recalcitrant carboxyl-rich alicyclic molecules (CRAM) in an organic soil profile

2024· preprint· en· W4392598345 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jeewan Gamage, James G. Longstaffe, Naresh V. Thevathasan, M. Sameer Al‐Abdul‐Wahid, Paul Voroney, Adam Gillespie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlicyclic compoundOrganic moleculesMoleculeChemistryOrganic chemistryEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recalcitrant soil organic matter (rSOM) plays a pivotal role in global carbon (C) sequestration within soil ecosystems, yet its formation remains enigmatic due to limited insights into its molecular composition and synthesis processes. Specifically, carboxyl-rich alicyclic molecules (CRAM) are recognized for their thermodynamic stability owing to their distinctive molecular structure and hydrophobic properties. In this study, we investigate the presence and transformation of CRAM structures within an organic soil profile employing 1D and 2D 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. We conducted organic matter extraction from distinct soil horizons from a soil profile at the Muck Research Station in Kettleby, Canada, utilizing acetonitrile (ACN) and n-hexane (HEX) as organic solvents. ACN effectively extracts condensed structures with O/C ratios exceeding 0.5, while hexane selectively targets lipid-like compounds with low O/C ratios (<0.1). The ACN and HEX solvents are known to represent rSOM components reliably. Notably, all samples exhibited a broad resonance assigned as CRAM with more resolved spectra from the Cg horizon, observed in the 1D 1H NMR. Transformation of CRAM in the Cg and Oh horizons towards increased aliphatic characteristics at the expense of functionalized protons was evident. Further analysis involved 1H-13C HSQC NMR spectroscopy, identifying five major spectral regions: Region I (δH: 0.5–1.5 ppm and δC: 10–30 ppm, associated with purely aliphatic groups), Region II (ca. δH: 1.5–3.5 ppm and δC: 30–45 ppm, linked to CRAM), Region III (ca. δH: 3.0–4.0 ppm and δC: 50–65 ppm, characterized by aromatic methoxyl groups indicating ethers and esters), Region IV (ca. δH: 3.25–4.5 ppm and δC: 65–80 ppm, associated with carbohydrates), and Region V (ca. δH: 6.25–7.5 ppm and δC: 115–135 ppm, representing aromatic structures). Significantly, CRAM components in the Cg horizon displayed distinct compositions from those derived in the upper horizons, suggesting microbial reworking and radical-assisted synthesis of biomolecules or precursors contributing to CRAM formation within the soil profile. Overall, the HSQC cross-peak positioning in all samples exhibited closer similarities to dissolved organic matter (DOM) of microbial origin rather than plant-derived DOM. In the lower Cg horizon, we observed a greater diversity of aliphatic and carbohydrate cross-peaks, highlighting both a higher degree of newly produced organic moieties and the potential for early diagenetic rSOM formation within the soil profile. These findings underscore the substantial role of CRAM in long-term carbon sequestration within soils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207