Intranasal delivery of a self-adjuvanted nanovaccine composed of the curli filaments and the highly conserved M2e epitope confers protection against influenza a virus in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intranasal administration of vaccines is an attractive delivery route to fight viral respiratory infections. However, there are only a few intranasal vaccines used in human, emphasizing the critical need to identify novel safe mucosal adjuvants and antigen delivery systems to expand their usage. We recently revealed an immunostimulating nanoparticle based on a fragment (R4R5) of the Curli-specific gene A (CsgA) protein that confers protection against influenza A virus (IAV) when conjugated to three repeats of the highly conserved M2e epitope and administrated intramuscularly. Herein, the efficacy of this 3M2e-R4R5 nanovaccine was investigated upon administration by intranasal instillation. By triggering robust M2e-specific humoral and cellular responses, both systemic and locally in the respiratory tract, and by priming alveolar macrophages, the intranasal vaccine protected mice against a lethal IAV challenge without the use of additional adjuvant. Thus, CsgA-based nanostructures could serve as a safe and self-adjuvanted antigen delivery system for mucosal immunization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".