MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392600163 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-5588

Performance of Through-Water Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry in Gravel-Bed Rivers: An Experimental Investigation

2024· preprint· en· W4392600163 on OpenAlexaff
Chendi Zhang, Wenqi Li, Marwan A. Hassan, Ao’ran Sun, Chao Qin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotogrammetryGeologyStructure from motionMotion (physics)Geotechnical engineeringHydrology (agriculture)Remote sensingComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry has become an efficient approach in acquiring high-resolution three-dimensional topographic data in geosciences and can be used for measuring submerged riverbed surfaces in shallow and clear water systems. However, the performance of through-water SfM photogrammetry has not been fully evaluated for gravel-bed surfaces, which limits its application to the morphodynamics of gravel-bed rivers in both field investigations and flume experiments. The measurement quality includes: (i) accuracy and precision of the measured underwater bed surface elevations; and (ii) statistical properties (first four moments and structural functions) of the bed surface elevation distributions.In order to evaluate the influence of bed texture, flow rate, ground control point (GCP) layout, and refraction correction (RC) on the measurement quality of through-water SfM photogrammetry, we conducted a series of experiments in a 70 m-long and 7 m-wide flume with a straight artificial channel under strictly controlled conditions. The channel size was comparable to a small natural stream so that the results could provide insights for not only flume experiments but also for UAV-based field investigations. Bed surfaces with strongly contrasting textures (fine sand cover vs. gravel cover) in two 4 m-long reaches were measured under five constant flows with three GCP layouts, including both dry and underwater GCPs. All the submerged surface models were compared with the corresponding dry bed surfaces to quantify their errors in elevations, moments, and outcomes of structural functions.The results illustrated that the poorly sorted gravel-bed led to smaller elevation errors than the bed covered by fine sand. The use of underwater GCPs made significant improvements to the elevation accuracy of direct through-water SfM photogrammetry, but counteracted with RC. The elevation errors of the submerged models linearly increased with water depth for all the tested conditions of bed textures, GCP layouts, and discharges in the uncorrected models, but the increasing slopes varied with bed texture. Fine sediment transport caused significant elevation errors, while the static sand dunes and grain clusters did not lead to noticeable errors in the corrected models with dry GCPs. The movement of fine sediment at high flows also led to significant errors in the second to fourth moments, horizontal correlation scales, Hurst exponents, and the errors in statistical properties for both uncorrected and corrected submerged models. The results show that through-water SfM photogrammetry is promising in capturing the topographic and statistical properties of underwater gravel-bed surfaces if fine sediment transport is carefully addressed.Keywords: Topographic measurement; Structure-from-Motion (SfM); through-water photogrammetry; gravel-bed river; refraction correction

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes→French-language works237,207→