MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392602566 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9220

Integration of DInSAR, climatic, and morphometric data through data-driven models for regional-scale activity classification of rock glaciers in South Tyrol (Italy)

2024· preprint· en· W4392602566 on OpenAlexaff
Chiara Crippa, Stefan Steger, Giovanni Cuozzo, Francesca Bearzot, Claudia Notarnicola

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlacierScale (ratio)GeologyPhysical geographyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-altitude regions serve as crucial indicators of climate change, with the Alps acting as a natural laboratory for studying glacial and periglacial processes. In situ and remote sensing techniques reveal permafrost degradation, coinciding with accelerated rates of rock glacier creep, potentially leading to destabilization.Our study, focused on South Tyrol (North-East Italy), aims to screen and classify rock glaciers, thus pinpointing hotspots and unraveling the factors influencing their activity through the integration of remote sensing approaches and data-driven models. Our analyses are based on an existing inventory of periglacial landforms (1779 in total) across South Tyrol, mapped using LIDAR DTMs (2.5 m GSD) and orthophotos. The dataset already includes a descriptive attribute of activity from independent morphological observations and a DInSAR coherence-based estimation (Bertone et al., 2019). However, it lacks a comprehensive definition of activity based on climatic drivers, displacement rate, and morphometric parameters.To quantify the velocity for each feature, we adopted a replicable workflow utilizing Sentinel 1A/B C-band images (2020-2022). This workflow involves three main steps: i) SAR pairs selection, filtering and processing using the Alaska Satellite Facility's Hybrid Pluggable Processing Pipeline (ASF HyP3); ii) atmospheric correction through a CNN (convolutional neural network) approach (Brencher et al., 2023); iii) time series inversion to produce mean LOS (Line-of-Sight) displacement rate maps through the MintPy algorithm (Yunjun et al., 2019).We processed geomorphological (slope, aspect, insolation, curvature, etc.) and climatic maps (precipitation, temperature, snow cover duration) from both in situ (weather stations) and remote sensing products (MODIS, Landsat) to extract 19 descriptive parameters potentially influencing the development and state of activity of rock glaciers. These parameters served as predictor variables in a multiclass GAM classifier (Generalized Additive Mixing Models) to categorize all mapped landforms in active, relict, or transitional classes (RGIK, 2022).After training the model on a subset of confidently classified features, we applied it to the entire rock glacier dataset, including features without an activity definition. Quantitative assessment of the model's performance, using the area under the ROC curve, consistently yielded results exceeding 0.86 across various k-fold cross-validation approaches.Our analysis not only enhanced classification accuracy but also provided insights into the factors influencing activity classes. A final classification using the Bulk Creep Factor (BCF) indicator (Cicioira et al., 2021), describing the dynamic state and rheology of large-scale rock glacier datasets, facilitated the selection of key case studies for a detailed local-scale investigation.This comprehensive approach refines the categorization of mapped features and contributes to a more detailed understanding of the factors controlling rock glacier activity in the alpine environment, particularly in South Tyrol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLandslides and related hazards→French-language works237,207→