MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392602675 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9309

High time resolution mapping of polar ionospheric flows with the SuperDARN Borealis systems

2024· preprint· en· W4392602675 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daniel Billett, Remington Rohel, K. A. McWilliams, C. J. Martin, K. M. Laundal, Jone Peter Reistad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonospherePolarResolution (logic)Polar capGeophysicsGeologyRemote sensingComputer sciencePhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last few years, the five SuperDARN HF ionospheric radars operated by the University of Saskatchewan have been upgraded to digital systems that utilise the flexibility and reliability of software defined radios (SDRs). SDRs allow for a vastly greater control of radar transmit and receive operations, bringing with them new capabilities for scientific experiments that were previously not feasible on analogue hardware. This next generation of SuperDARN radar is named Borealis.  One new radar operating mode implemented at the Borealis radars has been full field-of-view imaging. On traditional SuperDARN radars, one full scan of an entire field-of-view (an area encompassing thousands of kilometres at F-region ionospheric altitudes) takes approximately 1 minute as each of the 16 beam directions is sequentially integrated over. With Borealis, every beam direction can be probed (or “imaged”) simultaneously, providing a 16-fold improvement in scan temporal resolution to 3.5 seconds. We present a new ionospheric data product derived from Borealis imaging mode data: high time resolution mapping of polar E x B drifts. In contrast to traditional SuperDARN ionospheric convection patterns which are nominally derived every two minutes on a coarse global grid, Borealis convection patterns are derived locally over the Canadian polar cap every few seconds. This not only provides the opportunity to study mesoscale ionospheric phenomena like polar cap patches, flow channels, and substorms, but also allows for doing so at a temporal resolution not previously possible without compromising spatial coverage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207