Nasopharyngeal metatranscriptomics reveals host-pathogen signatures of pediatric sinusitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute sinusitis (AS) is the fifth leading cause of antibiotic prescriptions in children. Distinguishing bacterial AS from common viral upper respiratory infections in children is crucial to prevent unnecessary antibiotic use but is challenging with current diagnostic methods. Despite its speed and cost, untargeted RNA sequencing of clinical samples from children with suspected AS has the potential to overcome several limitations of other methods. However, the utility of sequencing-based approaches in analysis of AS has not been fully explored. Here, we performed RNA-seq of nasopharyngeal samples from 221 children with clinically diagnosed AS to characterize their pathogen and host-response profiles. Results from RNA-seq were compared with those obtained using culture for three common bacterial pathogens and qRT-PCR for 12 respiratory viruses. Metatranscriptomic pathogen detection showed high concordance with culture or qRT-PCR, showing 87%/81% sensitivity (sens) / specificity (spec) for detecting bacteria, and 86%/92% (sens/spec) for viruses, respectively. We also detected an additional 22 pathogens not tested for in the clinical panel, and identified plausible pathogens in 11/19 (58%) of cases where no organism was detected by culture or qRT-PCR. We assembled genomes of 205 viruses across the samples including novel strains of coronaviruses, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and enterovirus D68. By analyzing host gene expression, we identified host-response signatures that distinguished bacterial and viral infections and correlated with pathogen abundance. Ultimately, our study demonstrates the potential of untargeted metatranscriptomics for in depth analysis of the etiology of AS, comprehensive host-response profiling, and using these together to work towards optimized patient care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".