MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392617507 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.04604

Foundation for the ΔSCF Approach in Density Functional Theory

2024· preprint· en· W4392617507 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Weitao Yang, Paul W. Ayers

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFoundation (evidence)DeltaDensity functional theoryEngineeringPhysicsGeographyArchaeologyQuantum mechanicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extend ground-state density-functional theory to excited states and provide the theoretical formulation for the widely used $ΔSCF$ method for calculating excited-state energies and densities. As the electron density alone is insufficient to characterize excited states, we formulate excited-state theory using the defining variables of a noninteracting reference system, namely (1) the excitation quantum number $n_{s}$ and the potential $w_{s}(\mathbf{r})$ (excited-state potential-functional theory, $n$PFT), (2) the noninteracting wavefunction $Φ$ ($Φ$-functional theory, $Φ$FT), or (3) the noninteracting one-electron reduced density matrix $γ_{s}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}')$ (density-matrix-functional theory, $γ_{s}$FT). We show the equivalence of these three sets of variables and their corresponding energy functionals. Importantly, the ground and excited-state exchange-correlation energy use the \textit{same} universal functional, regardless of whether $\left(n_{s},w_{s}(\boldsymbol{r})\right)$, $Φ$, or $γ_{s}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}')$ is selected as the fundamental descriptor of the system. We derive the excited-state (generalized) Kohn-Sham equations. The minimum of all three functionals is the ground-state energy and, for ground states, they are all equivalent to the Hohenberg-Kohn-Sham method. The other stationary points of the functionals provide the excited-state energies and electron densities, establishing the foundation for the $ΔSCF$ method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207