Calibration‐free structured‐light‐based 3D scanning system in laparoscope for robotic surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate 3D shape measurement is crucial for surgical support and alignment in robotic surgery systems. Stereo cameras in laparoscopes offer a potential solution; however, their accuracy in stereo image matching diminishes when the target image has few textures. Although stereo matching with deep learning has gained significant attention, supervised learning requires a large dataset of images with depth annotations, which are scarce for laparoscopes. Thus, there is a strong demand to explore alternative methods for depth reconstruction or annotation for laparoscopes. Active stereo techniques are a promising approach for achieving 3D reconstruction without textures. In this study, a 3D shape reconstruction method is proposed using an ultra-small patterned projector attached to a laparoscopic arm to address these issues. The pattern projector emits a structured light with a grid-like pattern that features node-wise modulation for positional encoding. To scan the target object, multiple images are taken while the projector is in motion, and the relative poses of the projector and a camera are auto-calibrated using a differential rendering technique. In the experiment, the proposed method is evaluated by performing 3D reconstruction using images obtained from a surgical robot and comparing the results with a ground-truth shape obtained from X-ray CT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".