Assessing Parent-Adolescent Relationship: Communication Pattern and Conflict as Perceived by Adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Communication pattern and conflict have an obvious impact on parent adolescent relationship. Aim: This study aimed to assess parent-adolescent relationship: communication patterns and conflict as perceived by the adolescent. Design: A descriptive research design was utilized in this study. Setting: This study was carried out in the nursing schools subordinate to the curative organization in Cairo for female and Abo Bakr secondary school in Elmarg for males. Subjects: Simple random sample of 498 student and their parents in adolescent stage was recruited. Data collection tools. 1- Interview questionnaire including two parts: a-Demographic data for Students, b-Demographic data for parents,2-Parent_adolescent communication scale,3- Family strength scale (FSS), 4-Parent/adolescent social competencies-conflict behavior questionnaire. Results: More than half of the studied subjects had moderate conflict level of parent /adolescent social competences-conflict behavior and more than one quarter of them had mild conflict and more than three quarter of the studied adolescent had mild degree of communication problem with their parents. Conclusion: More than half of the studied adolescents had moderate conflict level of parent /adolescent social competences-conflict behavior and more than one quarter of them had mild conflict also more than three quarters of them had mild degree of openness of Parent –Adolescent communication under the studied subjects. Additionally, there were moderate positive correlations between parent-adolescent communication and family strength, and parent adolescent competencies conflict behavior. Recommendations: Parents should be aware of physical, cognitive and psychosocial changes and needs of adolescence period to deal with their children positively and implementing an educational program about parent-adolescent communication, conflicts to include parents and adolescents viewpoints about conflict.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".