MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392646066 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19278

Is methane being released from Norwegian glaciers? 

2024· preprint· en· W4392646066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Polášková, Jade Hatton, Jacob C. Yde, Siri Hesland Engen, Jakub Trubač, Lia Costa Pinto Wentzel, Guillaume Lamarche‐Gagnon, Sarah Tingey, Jemma L. Wadham, Marek Stibal, Sarah Elise Sapper

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorwegianGlacierMethaneEnvironmental scienceGeologyChemistryOceanographyGeomorphologyPhilosophyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent research underscores a potential, yet overlooked, positive climate feedback mechanism: the transport of subglacially produced methane (CH4) to the atmosphere via meltwater. While the majority of research focused on release from beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet, mountain glaciers have been largely understudied, creating a gap in our understanding of the spatial distribution of subglacial CH4 emissions. Emerging research from glaciers in Iceland, Canada, Alaska, and China suggests the presence of CH4 release also from glaciers other than the Greenland Ice Sheet. Here, we explore the potential of CH4 release from outlet glaciers of the Jostedalsbreen ice cap and Midtdalsbreen in central Norway. We investigated whether meltwaters from outlet glaciers of Jostedalsbreen (Tuftebreen, Fåbergstølsbreen, Bøyabreen, Supphelebreen, Austerdalsbreen and Nigardsbreen), along with Midtdalsbreen in Finse, act as a source of CH4 to the atmosphere. We collected discrete samples for dissolved CH4 (dCH4) and CO2 concentrations at all glacier outlets multiple times throughout the melt season. Additionally, we conducted longer time-series measurements of dCH4 at Tuftebreen, Fåbergstølsbreen and Midtdalsbreen, utilizing custom-made dCH4 sensors. Accompanying these measurements were samples analysed for water chemistry and stable isotopes of dCO2 (δ13C-CO2) in samples where concentrations were elevated compared to atmospheric equilibrium. Our results indicate that dCH4 concentrations in the meltwater of all studied glaciers remained below atmospheric equilibrium concentrations throughout the melt season. In contrast, dCO2 concentrations surpassed atmospheric equilibrium levels, suggesting that the studied glacial runoffs do not act as CH4 source to the atmosphere but might contribute as a small source of CO2. This dataset of dissolved greenhouse gases enhances our understanding of the spatial distribution of subglacial CH4 emissions, fostering discussions on carbon cycling beneath glaciers and the factors influencing the presence or absence of CH4 emissions from the subglacial domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→