MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392646254 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19289

Integrated reservoir and production system modeling of geothermal energy extraction at the Aquistore CCS site in Canada

2024· preprint· en· W4392646254 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kevin P. Hau, Maren Brehme, Alireza Rangriz Shokri, Reza Malakooti, Erik Nickel, Rick Chalaturnyk, Martin O. Saar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsPetroleum Technology Research CentreCanada Malting (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeothermal gradientExtraction (chemistry)Production (economics)Environmental scienceGeothermal energyPetroleum engineeringGeologyChemistryGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mitigating the global climate crisis is the greatest challenge facing humanity thiscentury. The transition of current energy systems towards carbon-neutral energyis inevitable. Renewable energy sources, particularly those that are both baseload-and dispatch-capable, such as geothermal energy, are essential to replace currentenergy systems that emit large amounts of CO2. In addition, permanent isolationof CO2 from the atmosphere, using carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), isindispensable to limit global warming to 1.5°C.To enable the full potential of geothermal energy extraction and of CCS, theirefficiencies need to be improved. One possibility is to integrate both technologies.Using CO2 as the geothermal energy extraction fluid approximately doubles energygeneration rates, compared to conventional, brine-based geothermal systems underour base-case conditions. Such CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems reinjectthe produced CO2, eventually sequestering all CO2 underground. Extracting thegeothermal energy from the CCS reservoir results in additional CO2 storage poten-tial, as, for example, the CO2 density increases and the overall reservoir pressuredecreases. The CPG-generated heat, electricity, and/or revenue could “subsidise”CCS operations. Consequently, CPG could increase both the geothermal energyand the CCS capacities.Our CPG feasibility study combines an integrated production system modelingapproach with a history-matched reservoir model of an active CCS site (Aquistore,Canada). The integrated modeling approach is used to account for all relevantprocesses, from well-bore pressure and temperature drops to multi-phase, multi-component fluid flow in the reservoir to fluid separation, power generation, andcontinuous with reinjection of CO2 at the land surface, in a fully implicit matter.Our results suggest that stable CO2 circulation, extracting geothermal energybetween the underground CO2 plume in the saline reservoir and the land surface,is possible. Furthermore, we see additional CO2 storage potential, caused by thecirculation of CO2. Our simulations indicate that Aquistore may provide a uniqueopportunity for pioneering a CPG field test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207