MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392660045 · doi:10.1101/2024.03.07.583950

hAMRonization: Enhancing antimicrobial resistance prediction using the PHA4GE AMR detection specification and tooling

2024· preprint· en· W4392660045 on OpenAlexafffund
Catarina Inês Mendes, Emma Griffiths, Alex Manuele, Daniel Fornika, Simon H. Tausch, Thanh Le-Viet, Jody Phelan, Conor J. Meehan, Amogelang R. Raphenya, Brian Alcock, Elizabeth Culp, Federico Lorenzo, María Sol Haim, Adam A. Witney, Allison Black, Lee S. Katz, Paul E. Oluniyi, Idowu B. Olawoye, Ruth Timme, Hui‐min Neoh, Su Datt Lam, Tengku Zetty Maztura Tengku Jamaluddin, Sheila Nathan, Mia Yang Ang, Sabrina Di Gregorio, Koen Vandelannoote, Rutaiwan Dusadeepong, Leonid Chindelevitch, Muhammad Ibtisam Nasar, David M. Aanensen, Ayorinde O. Afolayan, Erkison Ewomazino Odih, Andrew G. McArthur, Michael Feldgarden, Marcelo M Galas, Josefina Campos, Iruka N. Okeke, Anthony Underwood, Andrew J. Page, Duncan MacCannell, Finlay Maguire

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityInstitute of Infection and ImmunityMcMaster UniversityBC Centre for Disease ControlDalhousie UniversityVancouver Biotech (Canada)Simon Fraser University
FundersEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipBill and Melinda Gates FoundationBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilDirectorate for Biological SciencesNational Institutes of HealthU.S. National Library of MedicineForeign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeEuropean CommissionCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJoint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial ResistanceGenome Canada
KeywordsWorkflowPython (programming language)Computer scienceJSONFile formatModularity (biology)MetagenomicsData scienceDatabaseData miningGeneProgramming languageBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The detection of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers directly from genomic or metagenomic data is becoming a standard clinical and public health procedure. This has resulted in the development of a number of different bioinformatic AMR prediction tools. Although many may implement similar principles, these tools differ significantly in their supported inputs, search algorithms, parameterisation, and underlying reference databases. Each of these tools generates a report of detected AMR genes or variants in a distinct, non-standard, format. This presents a huge barrier to the comparison of results and to the modularity of tools for AMR gene prediction within bioinformatic workflows. In collaboration with 17 public health laboratories across 10 countries, the Public Health Alliance for Genomic Epidemiology (PHA4GE) ( https://pha4ge.org ) data structures working group has developed and piloted a standardized output specification for the bioinformatic detection of AMR from microbial genomes. In this report, we discuss hAMRonization, a python package and command-line utility, which implements PHA4GE’s AMR specification to combine the outputs of disparate antimicrobial resistance gene detection tools into a single unified format. hAMRonization can be easily extended and currently supports 18 different tools (both species-agnostic and species-specific) for the detection of genes and/or variants conferring AMR. The harmonized reports are available in tabular form, JSON format or through an interactive HTML file (e.g., https://maguire-lab.github.io/assets/interactive_report_demo.html ) that can be opened within the browser for navigable data exploration. As of 2024-03-07 hAMRonization has been downloaded ∼12,500 times, incorporated into >9 public bioinformatic tools and workflows, and been internally adopted by several national and international public health groups. The hAMRonization tool and underlying specification are open-source and freely available through PyPI, conda and GitHub ( https://github.com/pha4ge/hAMRonization ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207