MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392664758 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1779185

Efficacy and Safety of Fidanacogene Elaparvovec in Adults with Moderately Severe or Severe Hemophilia B: Results from the Phase 3 BENEGENE-2 Gene Therapy Trial

2024· article· en· W4392664758 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Klamroth, Adam Cuker, Hazzaa Alzahrani, Jan Astermark, Laurent Frenzel, Όλγα Κατσαρού, Kaan Kavaklı, Davide Matino, Amy D. Shapiro, J.-D. Wang, Joanne Fuiman, James M Mckay, Peng Sun, Jeremy Rupon

Bibliographic record

VenueHämostaseologie · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGenetic enhancementInternal medicinePhase (matter)PediatricsGeneBiologyGeneticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Fidanacogene elaparvovec (PF-06838435, formerly SPK-9001) is an adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy vector transferring the high-activity variant of human factor IX (FIX) FIX-R338L for the treatment of hemophilia B. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fidanacogene elaparvovec in participants with moderately severe or severe hemophilia B. Method BENEGENE-2 (NCT03861273) is a phase 3, open-label, single-arm trial that enrolled adult males with hemophilia B (FIX:C≤2 IU/dL) who had completed≥6 months of FIX prophylaxis prior to administration of 5e11 vg/kg fidanacogene elaparvovec. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority on annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for total (treated and untreated) bleeds from Week 12 to Month 15 post-infusion vs the pre-infusion prophylaxis period. Key secondary endpoints included FIX activity, ABR for treated bleeds, and annualized infusion rate. Other secondary endpoints included annualized FIX consumption, ABR of specific bleed types (eg, spontaneous), and frequency of target joint bleeds. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. Participants provided written informed consent and the study was approved by the relevant regulatory/ethics committees. Results Forty-five participants (median [range] age, 29 [18, 62] years) were dosed with fidanacogene elaparvovec. Total ABR was reduced by 71% post-fidanacogene elaparvovec treatment vs prophylaxis (mean ABR, 1.3 vs 4.4; P <0.0001; [ Fig. 1 ]) and was stable over time (0.4 at Year 3; n=21). Mean FIX activity, measured by one-stage SynthASil, one-stage Actin-FSL, and chromogenic assays, is shown in [ Fig. 2 ]. FIX activity remained relatively stable at Month 24 ([ Fig. 2 ]). Data for other secondary efficacy endpoints are shown in [ Fig. 1 ]. Twenty-eight participants (62%) received corticosteroids for presumed immune response. No deaths, infusion-related serious AEs, thrombotic events, or FIX inhibitors were reported. Fig. 1 Total bleeds, treated bleeds, annualized infusion rate and resumption of prophylaxis in the pre-infusion prophylaxis and post-infusion periods Fig. 2 Mean FIX activity levels (%) by one-stage SynthASil, one-stage Actin-FSL and chromogenic assays Conclusion Fidanacogene elaparvovec yielded endogenous FIX expression in participants with moderately severe to severe hemophilia B, resulting in significant decreases in bleeding and was generally well tolerated. Funding statement This study was sponsored by Pfizer. Publication History Article published online: 26 February 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHämostaseologieSame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207