MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392670160 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v9i3.2308

Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Laboratory among Healthcare Workers

2021· article· en· W4392670160 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adnan Ahmed B Alzahrani, Saeed Alqahtani, Majdi Mohammedsaeed M Nawar, Mahayl Ahmad Ahmed Alshehri, Kamla Abdo Hakami, Maha Ahmed AlGhamdi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth carePsychologyMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The use of chemicals in laboratories exposes laboratory staff to risks arising from hazardous chemicals. Accidents related to poor management and handling of chemicals have been reported in laboratories. Good implementation of occupational safety and health (OSH) in organizations that have implemented OSH-Management System (OSH-MS) plays an important role in reducing accidents at the workplace. This study aims: to assess the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) related to the OSH aspect in chemical handling among healthcare workers. Method: This is a cross-sectional survey involving laboratory workers. The study was conducted in two governmental hospital laboratories in Riyadh (AL Zulfi Hospital, and King Khaled Hospital) Saudi Arabia. A total of 120 laboratory staff were recruited and data on KAP was collected using self- administered questionnaires. Items in the questionnaire were adapted from previous studies and published guidelines. Data obtained were entered into statistical software for analysis. Results: approximately two-thirds of the respondents have high knowledge of OSH, 96% have a positive attitude and 84% have good practice on OSH. Moreover, the present study revealed that there was no significant difference in the knowledge level between laboratory workers. Similarly, there is no significant difference in the attitude level between laboratory workers. However, the tests show that there is a significant difference in the practice level between laboratory workers. Furthermore, the results of this study showed evidence of the association between gender (0.049) and practice level; the association between age (0.011*) and knowledge level, and education level (p=0.003) and knowledge level. Conclusion: There were the implementation of a suitable, adequate, and effective management system that is continually improved is crucial and needs to be implemented to manage the OSH risks in the organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicHealthcare and Environmental Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207