MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392698105 · doi:10.3233/jnd-230216

Improving Diagnostic Precision: Phenotype-Driven Analysis Uncovers a Maternal Mosaicism in an Individual with <i>RYR1</i> -Congenital Myopathy

2024· article· en· W4392698105 on OpenAlexafffund
Berta Estévez‐Arias, Leslie Matalonga, Loreto Martorell, Anna Codina, C. Ortez, Laura Carrera‐García, J. Expósito, Dèlia Yubero, Janet Hoenicka, Cristina Jou, Francesc Palau, Sergi Beltrán, Hanns Lochmüller, Ana Töpf, A. Nascimento, Daniel Natera‐de Benito

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuromuscular Diseases · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersHORIZON EUROPE HealthInstituto de Salud Carlos IIICanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónCanada Research ChairsCanada First Research Excellence FundEuropean CommissionAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaGovernment of CanadaFundación Ramón Areces
KeywordsProbandRYR1PhenotypeGeneticsExome sequencingAsymptomaticMyopathyMedicineGenetic testingBiologyMutationPathologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital myopathies (CMs) are rare genetic disorders for which the diagnostic yield does not typically exceed 60% . We performed deep phenotyping, histopathological studies, clinical exome and trio genome sequencing and a phenotype-driven analysis of the genomic data, that led to the molecular diagnosis in a child with CM. We identified a heterozygous variant in RYR1 in the affected child, inherited from her asymptomatic mother. Given the alignment of the clinical and histopathological phenotype with RYR1-CM, we considered the potential existence of a missing second variant in trans in the proband, but also hypothesized that the variant might be mosaic in the mother, as subsequently demonstrated. Our study is an example of how heterozygous variants inherited from asymptomatic parents are frequently dismissed. When the genotype-phenotype correlation is strong, it is recommended to consider a parental mosaicism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuromuscular DiseasesSame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207