Cause of Concussion With Persisting Symptoms Is Associated With Long-Term Recovery and Symptom Type, Duration, and Number in a Longitudinal Cohort of 600 Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is important for patients and clinicians to know the potential for recovery from concussion as soon as possible after injury, especially in patients who do not recover completely in the first month and have concussion with persisting concussion symptoms (C+PCS). We assessed the association between the causes of concussion and recovery from C+PCS in a consecutive retrospective and prospective cohort of 600 patients referred to the Canadian Concussion Center (CCC) at Toronto Western Hospital. Data were obtained from clinical records and follow-up questionnaires and not from a standardized database. A novel method was used to assess long-term recovery, and multi-variable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess relationships between cause of concussion and time to recovery. We examined the subsequent recovery of patients who had not recovered after at least one month from the time of concussion. Patients were grouped into the following four causes: sports and recreation (S&R, n = 312, 52%); motor vehicle collisions (MVC, n = 103, 17%); falls ( n = 100, 17%); and being struck by an object including violence (SBOV, n = 85, 14%). The MVC group had the highest percentage of females (75.7%), the oldest participants (median: 40.0 [interquartile range (IQR):30.5–49.0] years), the most symptoms (median:11.0 [IQR:8.5–15.0]), and the longest symptom duration (median: 28.0 [IQR:12.0–56.00] months). In contrast, the S&R group had the highest percentage of males (58.1%), the youngest participants (median:20.0 [IQR:17.0–30.0] years), the best recovery outcome, and shortest symptom duration (median:22.0 [IQR:8.0–49.5] months). Significant differences among the four causes included age ( p < 0.001), sex ( p < 0.001), number of previous concussions ( p < 0.001), history of psychiatric disorders ( p = 0.002), and migraine ( p = 0.001). Recovery from concussion was categorized into three groups: (1) Complete Recovery occurred in only 60 (10%) patients with median time 8.0 (IQR:3.5–18.0) months and included 42 S&R, 7 MVC, 8 falls, and 3 SBOV; (2) Incomplete Recovery occurred in 408 (68.0%) patients with persisting median symptom time of 5.0 (IQR:2.0–12.0) months; and (3) Unknown Recovery occurred in 132 (22.0%) patients and was because of lack of follow-up. In summary, the cause of C+PCS was associated with the type, number, and duration of symptoms and time required for recovery, although all causes of C+PCS produced prolonged symptoms in a large percentage of patients, which emphasizes the importance of concussions as a public health concern necessitating improved prevention and treatment strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".