A novel visible and near-infrared hyperspectral imaging platform for automated breast-cancer detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. Early and accurate detection is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Our study utilizes Visible and Near-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging (VIS-NIR HSI), a promising non-invasive technique, to detect cancerous regions in ex-vivo breast specimens based on their hyperspectral response. METHODS: In this paper, we present a novel HSI platform integrated with fuzzy c-means clustering for automated breast cancer detection. We acquire hyperspectral data from breast tissue samples, and preprocess it to reduce noise and enhance hyperspectral features. Fuzzy c-means clustering is then applied to segment cancerous regions based on their spectral characteristics. RESULTS: Our approach demonstrates promising results. We evaluated the quality of the clustering using metrics like Silhouette Index (SI), Davies-Bouldin Index (DBI), and Calinski-Harabasz Index (CHI). The clustering metrics results revealed an optimal number of 6 clusters for breast tissue classification, and the SI values ranged from 0.68 to 0.72, indicating well-separated clusters. Moreover, the CHI values showed that the clusters were well-defined, and the DBI values demonstrated low cluster dispersion. Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of our system were evaluated on a dataset of breast tissue samples. We achieved an average sensitivity of 96.83%, specificity of 93.39%, and accuracy of 95.12%. These results indicate the effectiveness of our HSI-based approach in distinguishing cancerous and non-cancerous regions. CONCLUSIONS: The paper introduces a robust hyperspectral imaging platform coupled with fuzzy c-means clustering for automated breast cancer detection. The clustering metrics results support the reliability of our approach in effectively segmenting breast tissue samples. In addition, the system shows high sensitivity and specificity, making it a valuable tool for early-stage breast cancer diagnosis. This innovative approach holds great potential for improving breast cancer screening and, thereby, enhancing our understanding of the disease and its detection patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".