Pore-Scale Investigation of Caprock Integrity in Underground Hydrogen Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the sealing capacity of shale caprocks for underground storage of hydrogen (H2) utilizing mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP) data of caprock samples. The research explores the influence of capillary forces on gas leakage through caprocks and evaluates the effectiveness of caprocks in confining H2 and CO2. Results indicate that the interfacial tension between H2 and water/brine is significantly higher than that between CO2 and water/brine, leading to greater column heights for H2 (ranging from 59 to 667 meters) compared to CO2 (ranging from 20 to 500 meters). Additionally, the study reveals that thicker caprock layers significantly reduce the rate of gas leakage, with CO2 exhibiting higher mass leakage rates due to its larger molar mass and lower interfacial tension compared to H2. Furthermore, while the capillary bundle model estimates higher leakage rates, the pore network model, accounting for the shielding effect of small channels, predicts lower leakage rates, demonstrating its potential for more accurate estimations. The findings highlight the potential of shale caprocks as effective barriers for H2 and CO2 storage, emphasizing the importance of capillary forces and caprock thickness in mitigating gas leakage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".