PENGARUH SERVICE QUALITY, PROMOTION, BRAND AMBASSADOR DAN BRAND AWARENESS TERHADAP PURCHASE DECISION DI APLIKASI TOKOPEDIA DIMEDIASI OLEH BRAND IMAGE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan pembelian masyarakat pada aplikasi Tokopedia di Kota Batam. . Desain penelitian yang digunakan peneliti dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif. Penelitian ini mengambil dan menggunakan penelitian survei dari sampel suatu populasi kemudian menyebarkan kuesioner dan menggunakan kuesioner sebagai pengumpulan data utama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa variabel Kualitas Pelayanan dan Brand Ambassador mempunyai pengaruh positif signifikan terhadap Brand Image. Variabel Kesadaran Merek dan Promosi ditemukan mempunyai pengaruh yang tidak signifikan terhadap Citra Merek. Selain itu Citra Merek ditemukan tidak memediasi pengaruh variabel Kualitas Pelayanan, Duta Merek, Kesadaran Merek, Promosi terhadap Keputusan Pembelian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".