MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392737325 · doi:10.22331/q-2025-06-12-1768

Low Overhead Qutrit Magic State Distillation

2025· preprint· lv· W4392737325 on OpenAlexaff
Shiroman Prakash, Tanay Saha

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantum · 2025
Typepreprint
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersScience and Engineering Research BoardDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsQutritDistillationMAGIC (telescope)Overhead (engineering)State (computer science)Computer scienceChemistryQubitPhysicsChromatographyAlgorithmOperating systemQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that using qutrits rather than qubits leads to a substantial reduction in the overhead cost associated with an approach to fault-tolerant quantum computing known as magic state distillation. We construct a family of [[9m−k,k,2]]3 triorthogonal qutrit error-correcting codes for any positive integers m and k with k≤3m−2 that are suitable for magic state distillation. In magic state distillation, the number of ancillae required to produce a magic state with target error rate ϵ is O(logγ⁡ϵ−1) , where the yield parameter γ characterizes the overhead cost. For k=3m−2 , our codes have γ=log2⁡(2+63m−2) , which tends to 1 as m→∞ . Moreover, the [[20,7,2]]3 qutrit code that arises from our construction when m=3 already has a yield parameter of 1.51 which outperforms all known qubit triorthogonal codes of size less than a few hundred qubits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantumSame topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207