MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392754043 · doi:10.5821/siiu.12665

Tecnologias de lo común: ficciones sobre la ciudad cuidadora y la producción del cooperativismo de vivienda en Uruguay

2023· article· en· W4392754043 on OpenAlexaff
Lorena Logiuratto, Maite Echaider

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The houses made in Uruguay under the cooperative system since the beginning of the 70s, are recognized as a socially and politically legitimized way of collective construction of the habitat. From its bases, the system promotes a collective model that forms an alternative to the hegemonic ways of the market to produce habitable space with a national territory reach. The proposal presented is the result of the link between academic networks and the Gender Area of the Uruguayan Federation of Mutual Aid Cooperatives (FUCVAM) with the aim of building a critical and proactive look at the modes of production and use of the housing cooperatives collective space, leaning on urban formulations of feminism. Particularly, addressing hypotheses of transformations in the configuration, quantification, distribution, uses and arrangements of common spaces, understood as areas capable of redirecting roles and relationships, based on sex-gender regulations, and articulating various social care strategies linked to the sustainability of life. Las viviendas realizadas en Uruguay, desde comienzos de los años 70 bajo el sistema cooperativo, se reconocen como un modo social y políticamente legitimado de construcción colectiva del hábitat. Desde sus bases promueve un modelo que conforma una alternativa a los modos hegemónicos del mercadode producir el espacio habitable. La propuesta presentada es resultado de la vinculación entre redes académicas y el Área de Género de la Federación Uruguaya de Cooperativas de Ayuda Mutua (FUCVAM) con el objetivo de construir una mirada crítica y propositiva a los modos de producción y uso del espacio colectivo de las cooperativas de vivienda apoyándose en formulaciones urbanas del feminismo. Especialmente, atendiendo hipótesis de transformaciones en la configuración, cuantificación, distribución, usos y agenciamientos de espacios comunes, entendidos como ámbitos capaces de redireccionar roles y relacionamientos basados en normatividades de sexo-género, y articular estrategias de cuidado social vinculadas a la sostenibilidad de la vida.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLatin American Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207