Tecnologias de lo común: ficciones sobre la ciudad cuidadora y la producción del cooperativismo de vivienda en Uruguay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The houses made in Uruguay under the cooperative system since the beginning of the 70s, are recognized as a socially and politically legitimized way of collective construction of the habitat. From its bases, the system promotes a collective model that forms an alternative to the hegemonic ways of the market to produce habitable space with a national territory reach. The proposal presented is the result of the link between academic networks and the Gender Area of the Uruguayan Federation of Mutual Aid Cooperatives (FUCVAM) with the aim of building a critical and proactive look at the modes of production and use of the housing cooperatives collective space, leaning on urban formulations of feminism. Particularly, addressing hypotheses of transformations in the configuration, quantification, distribution, uses and arrangements of common spaces, understood as areas capable of redirecting roles and relationships, based on sex-gender regulations, and articulating various social care strategies linked to the sustainability of life. Las viviendas realizadas en Uruguay, desde comienzos de los años 70 bajo el sistema cooperativo, se reconocen como un modo social y políticamente legitimado de construcción colectiva del hábitat. Desde sus bases promueve un modelo que conforma una alternativa a los modos hegemónicos del mercadode producir el espacio habitable. La propuesta presentada es resultado de la vinculación entre redes académicas y el Área de Género de la Federación Uruguaya de Cooperativas de Ayuda Mutua (FUCVAM) con el objetivo de construir una mirada crítica y propositiva a los modos de producción y uso del espacio colectivo de las cooperativas de vivienda apoyándose en formulaciones urbanas del feminismo. Especialmente, atendiendo hipótesis de transformaciones en la configuración, cuantificación, distribución, usos y agenciamientos de espacios comunes, entendidos como ámbitos capaces de redireccionar roles y relacionamientos basados en normatividades de sexo-género, y articular estrategias de cuidado social vinculadas a la sostenibilidad de la vida.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".