MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392757952 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-13727

The effects of near-surface turbulence on CO2 flux at the ocean-atmosphere boundary 

2024· preprint· en· W4392757952 on OpenAlexaff
Josiane Ostiguy, Ruth Musgrave, Graig Sutherland, Douglas C. Wallace, Anneke ten Doeschate

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmosphere (unit)TurbulenceFlux (metallurgy)Atmospheric sciencesBoundary (topology)Environmental sciencePhysicsMechanicsMeteorologyMaterials scienceMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) seeks to store carbon in the ocean as bicarbonate or carbonate ions and thus accelerates CO2 uptake from the atmosphere. Near-surface ocean turbulence is an important driver of CO2 uptake by the ocean as it affects the rate at which air-sea gas exchange occurs. Turbulent mixing can also cause high alkalinity water to sink out of the mixed layer, where it will no longer be in contact with the atmosphere. In this presentation we will show the results of high resolution numerical simulations in which alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon are advected in a turbulent mixed layer. By coupling the physics to a simple carbonate system solver, we evaluate the potential impact of surface turbulence on CO2 flux into the ocean. We explore the impact of ocean surface processes on the evolution and downwards diffusion of a surface alkalinity addition as influenced by different wind, temperature and precipitation conditions. The CO2 flux is computed according to both an empirical and a physically derived parameterization, and an estimate of the sensitivity of the total CO2 flux to the choice of parameterization is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→