Atmospheric deposition of local mineral dust delivers nutrients to the ‘Dark Zone’ of the Greenland Ice Sheet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ‘Dark Zone’ refers to a region of low-albedo ice currently prominent along the western margin of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS). The Dark Zone hosts pigmented glacier ice algae that bloom on the ice surface, thereby contributing to darkening and melting of surface ice. These pigmented glacier ice algae grow in association with other impurities found on the ice surface, namely mineral dust. Mineral dust provides inorganic nutrients to the ice surface habitat in the Dark Zone. As such, constraining the abundance, composition, source, and deposition rate of mineral dust is important for understanding the role of mineral dust in glacier ice algal bloom development and thus the further development of the Dark Zone in other areas of Greenland. Here we characterize the mineralogy, geochemistry, and deposition rates of airborne mineral dust delivered to a site in the SW-margin of the Dark Zone during two field campaigns. Mineral dust delivered by both dry deposition and snowfall was composed of very fine-grained (< 1 µm diameter) silicate mineral fragments, and based on the rare Earth element (REE) signature the dust was primarily from local Greenlandic sources. Potential emission sensitivity (PES) hindcast simulations produced using the Lagrangian FLEXible PARTicle (FLEXPART) dispersion model indicated that PES values were highest over Greenland, thereby corroborating the REE geochemical results by indicating that the sampled aerosols were more likely derived from locations above or near Greenland than more distal locations. The deposited mineral dust contained low concentrations of phosphorus, present in the mineral apatite (Ca5[PO4]3[Cl/F/OH]), confirming that atmospheric deposition of mineral dust provides a mechanism for delivering phosphorus to the Dark Zone of the GrIS, thereby fertilizing the glacial ice algal blooms growing on the ice surface. Our findings have crucial implications for the current and future development of glacier ice algal blooms in this region as well as their role in albedo reduction and surface melting across Greenland in a future warming climate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".