MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392759734 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-14009

Phenology and knowledge mobilization about the importance of trees in urban environments in southern Quebec, Canada

2024· preprint· en· W4392759734 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elisabeth Levac, Bruno Courtemanche

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Green Space and Health
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobilizationPhenologyGeographyPolitical scienceEcologyArchaeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A phenology project was launched in 2020 in the Eastern Townships region of southern Quebec, Canada, with the help from students from Bishop’s University. Initially, one of the main goals was to boost local phenology observations and gather data that will become useful in the future to document the impacts of climate change. We also wanted to pair the pollen monitoring programme that exists in Sherbrooke since 2006 with directs phenological observations of the local vegetation. The other goal of TreeTraque is to increase people's awareness of the impacts of climate change on vegetation. Riding on the momentum generated by the recent adoption of the politique de l’arbre (tree- or greening policy) by the city of Sherbrooke and by the push from numerous conservation organizations within the region, we are now adding a knowledge mobilization component to the project. We wish to reach the genera public more broadly to educate them about the importance of trees in the urban environment: they combat the urban heat island effect, capture atmospheric pollution, and enhance the esthetics of a neighbourhood. A few greening programs are already in place in Sherbrooke, however, they only aim at planting trees on institutional, industrial and commercial lots. It appears important to raise awareness among the general population, especially homeowners. Indeed, in some neighbourhoods, we see that numerous owners choose not to have trees on their property or prefer shrubs or plants that do not provide any shade on buildings, streets or driveways. Our long-term objective is to create more shade to help combat the urban heat island effects and reduce the impacts of future heat waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Green Space and Health→French-language works237,207→