MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392760049 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15411

Linking sedimentary imprints of storms and tsunamis with numerical wave modeling: A case from a coastal lagoon in the Lesser Antilles (Saint Martin)

2024· preprint· en· W4392760049 on OpenAlexaff
Stefano C. Fabbri, Pierre Sabatier, Raphaël Paris, Simon Falvard, Nathalie Feuillet, Amélie Lothoz, Guillaume St‐Onge, Audrey Gailler, Louise Cordrie, Fabien Arnaud, Maude Biguenet, Thibault Coulombier, Saptarshee Mitra, Éric Chaumillon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStormSAINTGeologyOceanographySedimentary rockMeteorologyClimatologySeismologyGeographyHistoryPaleontologyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined sedimentary records in a coastal lagoon on Saint Martin Island in the Lesser Antilles to identify and characterize extreme-wave events (EWEs), such as hurricanes and tsunamis. Employing a comprehensive approach involving sedimentological, geochemical, and radiocarbon dating analyses, complemented by X-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT) for examining sediment fabrics, we applied this multiproxy method to three oriented short sediment cores along a transect. This allowed us to identify sediment layers linked to both tsunami- and hurricane-induced EWEs. Five out of the seven EWEs were identified as paleo-tsunamis through their geochemical, sedimentary, and structural signatures. These five paleotsunamis were successfully dated over the last 3500 years, including the well-documented Pre-Columbian tsunami at approximately 1400 yrs CE and the transatlantic Lisbon tsunami at 1755 CE. This suggests a tentative local tsunami chronology of five well-documented events over the last 3500 years with a recurrence interval of 400 to 500 years.However, the most recent EWE corresponded to the powerful Category 5 Hurricane Irma in 2017. Over the last 150 years, another 14 less intense hurricanes impacted the island, leaving no sediment imprints in the lagoon. This finding is in line with most recent publications showing that tropical storm intensification rates have already changed as anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have warmed the globe (Garner, 2023).Furthermore, micro-CT-based sediment analysis provided a deeper understanding of the relationship between sediment fabric and tsunami wave dynamics. Therefore, we used the deposits of the Pre-Columbian tsunami and compared paleo-flow directions from micro-CT-derived fabric patterns to those from numerical tsunami models. The results that best explain the Pre-Columbian tsunami deposit emplacement are in line with a Mw 8.5–8.7 megathrust earthquake source located on the subduction interface at the Puerto Rico Trench, north of Anegada Island (Cordrie et al., 2022). Ultimately, integrating deposits of EWEs with numerical models is pivotal for devising effective hazard mitigation strategies tailored to vulnerable coastal communities.Cordrie, L., Feuillet, N., Gailler, A., Biguenet, M., Chaumillon, E., Sabatier, P., 2022. A Megathrust earthquake as source of a Pre-Colombian tsunami in Lesser Antilles: Insight from sediment deposits and tsunami modeling. Earth Sci Rev 228, 104018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104018Garner, A.J. Observed increases in North Atlantic tropical cyclone peak intensification rates. Sci Rep 13, 16299 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42669-y

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→