MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392760635 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-14650

In-situ LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of lower greenschist facies xenotime

2024· preprint· en· W4392760635 on OpenAlexaff
Marianne Sophie Hollinetz, Christopher R.M. McFarlane, David Schneider, Benjamin Huet, Bernhard Grasemann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenschistIn situGeologyGeochemistryChemistryMetamorphic rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xenotime, a common accessory mineral in metasedimentary rocks, is reactive during metamorphism and can incorporate significant amounts of uranium, making it a promising target for in-situ U-Pb geochonology. However, small grain sizes and cryptic mineral zoning limit the applicability of this tool in low-grade metamorphic rocks thus far. Herein we present results from the dating of two low-grade metamorphic samples collected in the Tirolic-Noric Nappe System at the southern base of Dachstein and Hochschwab massifs (Eastern Alps, Austria). These weakly metamorphosed metasediments, in which sedimentary structures are preserved, underwent metamorphism during the Cretaceous Eo-Alpine event, resulting in a mineral assemblage consisting of chloritoid + pyrophyllite + muscovite + hematite + rutile + quartz that infers P-T conditions of ~350°C and 0.2-0.6 GPa.Both samples contain accessory xenotime grains that typically range from 10 to 30 µm in diameter. SEM imaging and chemical mapping reveal systematic chemical zoning of most xenotime grains with a heterogeneous core and a distinct, 5-10 µm wide rim that is enriched in MREEs (Sm-Gd). We targeted each chemical domain of xenotime by in-situ LA-ICPMS U-Pb dating using a 5 µm beam diameter. In addition to U and Pb isotopes, Gd and Y concentrations were monitored. The majority of concordant U-Pb dates in both samples range between 632 and 250 Ma. These analyses exhibit low Gd/Y ratios consistent with the xenotime core composition and are therefore interpreted as an inherited population. Both samples exhibit a younger age cluster characterized by high Gd/Y ratios, corresponding to the MREE-rich xenotime rim. In the Hochschwab sample, the youngest cluster yields a concordia age of 134.2 ± 4.0 Ma (MSWD: 2.7, n: 7). Host-inclusion relationships of chloritoid and xenotime suggest coeval growth of the MREE-rich xenotime rim and chloritoid porphyroblasts, linking the U-Pb date to the growth of the main metamorphic assemblage. In the Dachstein sample, the youngest cluster yields a concordia age of 92.4 ± 1.5 Ma (MSWD: 2.9, n: 9). Xenotime and chloritoid are not observed in direct contact, and this sample is characterized by a pervasive crenulation cleavage, which postdates chloritoid growth. From the distribution and morphology of xenotime we conclude that dissolution-precipitation related to crenulation cleavage formation facilitated growth of the MREE-rich rim.Our results suggest that several stages of xenotime precipitation occurred during protracted or multistage tectono-metamorphic activity in the Tirolic-Noric Nappe System during the Eo-Alpine metamorphic evolution, which is also corroborated by published geochronological data in the same unit. We also demonstrate that the constantly improving spatial resolution of LA-ICP-MS systems allows successful in-situ dating of minute xenotime growth zones, thus providing great potential to improve our understanding of processes during low-grade metamorphism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology→French-language works237,207→