Wiener Filter Using the Conjugate Gradient Method and a Third-Order Tensor Decomposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In linear system identification problems, the Wiener filter represents a popular tool and stands as an important benchmark. Nevertheless, it faces significant challenges when identifying long-length impulse responses. In order to address the related shortcomings, the solution presented in this paper is based on a third-order tensor decomposition technique, while the resulting sets of Wiener–Hopf equations are solved with the conjugate gradient (CG) method. Due to the decomposition-based approach, the number of coefficients (i.e., the parameter space of the filter) is greatly reduced, which results in operating with smaller data structures within the algorithm. As a result, improved robustness and accuracy can be achieved, especially in harsh scenarios (e.g., limited/incomplete sets of data and/or noisy conditions). Besides, the CG-based solution avoids matrix inversion operations, together with the related numerical and complexity issues. The simulation results are obtained in a network echo cancellation scenario and support the performance gain. In this context, the proposed iterative Wiener filter outperforms the conventional benchmark and also some previously developed counterparts that use matrix inversion or second-order tensor decompositions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".