MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392788117 · doi:10.5539/jas.v16n3p1

Assessement of the Acidity of Progenies From Crosses Between Double Self-fertilized DA 115 D AF AF × LM 2 T AF AF Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) Progenitors in Côte d’Ivoire

2024· article· en· W4392788117 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean-Noël Konan, Mègbê Soumahoro, Auguste-Denise Mambé BOYE, Vamara Paterne Fofana

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Palm Production and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElaeis guineensisPalm oilBotanyHorticulturePalmBiologyPhysicsFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crude palm oil, extracted from the mesocarp of the fruit of the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.), is the world’s most widely produced and consumed vegetable oil. However, the food quality of this oil is influenced by its acidification and the negative effects associated with this acidity. Recent work on progenies from the DA 115 D of the Deli population and LM 2 T of the La Mé population involved in seed production has shown variability in oil acidity within and between these progenies, suggesting the possibility of selection to improve palm oil quality in these progenies. To improve the quality of the oil produced in Côte d’Ivoire, progeny from crosses between double self-fertilized progenitors of DA 115 D and LM 2 T origins were evaluated. The acidity of these progenies was determined using the near infrared spectrometer (NIR). The results showed that 4 progenies were homogeneous with low acidities (acidity < 5%) and 9 progenies were heterogeneous with low and medium acidities (5% < acidity < 10%). In addition, only offspring from combinations involving LM 2509 D AF were homogeneous. As a result, the average acidity of each progeny was all below 5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicOil Palm Production and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207