MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392799119 · doi:10.1183/13993003.01622-2023

FEV<sub>1</sub>Q: a race-neutral approach to assessing lung function

2024· article· en· W4392799119 on OpenAlexaff
Aparna Balasubramanian, Robert A. Wise, Sanja Stanojevic, Martin R. Miller, Meredith C. McCormack

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicineSpirometryNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyPercentileDemographyHazard ratioInternal medicinePopulationPulmonary function testingCardiologyConfidence intervalAsthmaStatisticsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Forced expiratory volume in 1 s quotient (FEV 1 Q) is a simple approach to spirometry interpretation that compares measured lung function to a lower boundary. This study evaluated how well FEV 1 Q predicts survival compared with current interpretation methods and whether race impacts FEV 1 Q. Methods White and Black adults with complete spirometry and mortality data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for lung transplant referrals were included. FEV 1 Q was calculated as FEV 1 divided by 0.4 L for females or 0.5 L for males. Cumulative distributions of FEV 1 were compared across races. Cox proportional hazards models tested mortality risk from FEV 1 Q adjusting for age, sex, height, smoking, income and among UNOS individuals, referral diagnosis. Harrell's C-statistics were compared between absolute FEV 1 , FEV 1 Q, FEV 1 /height 2 , FEV 1 z-scores and FEV 1 % predicted. Analyses were stratified by race. Results Among 7182 individuals from NHANES III and 7149 from UNOS, 1907 (27%) and 991 (14%), respectively, were Black. The lower boundary FEV 1 values did not differ between Black and White individuals in either population (FEV 1 first percentile difference ≤0.01 L; p>0.05). Decreasing FEV 1 Q was associated with increasing hazard ratio (HR) for mortality (NHANES III HR 1.33 (95% CI 1.28–1.39) and UNOS HR 1.18 (95% CI 1.12–1.23)). The associations were not confounded nor modified by race. Discriminative power was highest for FEV 1 Q compared with alternative FEV 1 approaches in both Black and White individuals. Conclusions FEV 1 Q is an intuitive and simple race-neutral approach to interpreting FEV 1 that predicts survival better than current alternative methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory JournalSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207