MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392808556 · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-05902-6

Genomic diversity of the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus in Japan reveals the complex genomic basis of azole resistance

2024· article· en· W4392808556 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xiaohui He, Yoko Kusuya, Daisuke Hagiwara, Takahito Toyotome, Teppei Arai, Cai Bian, Masaki Nagayama, Saho Shibata, Akira Watanabe, Hiroki Takahashi

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyInstitute of GeneticsJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsAspergillus fumigatusBiologyGeneticsGenomeAzolePopulationPathogenic fungusMutantFungusGenetic diversityMicrobiologyGeneAntifungal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aspergillus fumigatus is a pathogenic fungus with a global distribution. The emergence of azole-resistant A. fumigatus (ARAf) other than the TR-mutants is a problem in Japan. Additionally, the genetic diversity of A. fumigatus strains in Japan remains relatively unknown. Here we show the diversity in the A. fumigatus strains isolated in Japan as well as the complexity in the global distribution of the pathogenic strains. First, we analyzed the genome sequences of 171 strains from Japan as well as the antifungal susceptibility of these strains. Next, we conducted a population analysis of 876 strains by combining the available genomic data for strains isolated worldwide, which were grouped in six clusters. Finally, a genome-wide association study identified the genomic loci associated with ARAf strains, but not the TR-mutants. These results highlight the complexity of the genomic mechanism underlying the emergence of ARAf strains other than the TR-mutants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications BiologySame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207