Ultrasound Guided Hip Injections with High Density Hyaluronic Acid: Outcome at One Year Follow Up
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ultrasound guided viscosupplementation of the hip joint with hyaluronic acid(HA)is considered a standard procedure among the conservative treatments for hip arthritis.The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical benefit and the incidence of adverse events of the technique in a obseravtional study at one year follow up. We evaluated a consecutive series of 85 patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic arthritis that performed intra-articular ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid injections. The scales used for evaluation were modified Harris Hip Score(mHHS),WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University),Hip Outcome Score (HOOS) with subscale Sport (HOOSs), for pain the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS).The patients were classified according to Tonnis’ radiological classification of arthrosis (range 0-3):20 patients(grade 0),32(grade 1),18(grade 2),15(grade 3).At last follow up all the scales increased:mHHS from 59.35 to 82.1,HOOS from 69.45 to 78.53,HOS Sport from 47.4 to 58.11,VAS from 6.09 to 3.97,WOMAC from 33.2 to 31.5 (p<0.05 for all the parameters);13/85 requested arthroplasty. Based on our findings, indication for use of hyaluronic acid is limited to patients with mild to moderate arthritis.Patients in advanced arthritis refusing replacement surgery and asking for this treatment should be informed about the poor results of the technique even in the short term follow up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".