Does the temperature–size rule apply to idiobiont parasitoids?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In most ectotherms, several life‐history traits, including body size, respond to environmental conditions through the temperature–size rule (TSR). The mechanisms underlying the TSR are still being debated, but studying idiobiont insect parasitoids, which develop with a fixed amount of resources, may shed light on this relationship. In this study, we conducted experiments to determine how the developmental temperature affects various characteristics of male and female Trichogramma euproctidis (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), an idiobiont egg parasitoid of Lepidoptera. The study tested various hypotheses, including the cellular or oxygen diffusion hypotheses and the resource acquisition hypothesis, to understand whether T. euproctidis follows the TSR. The developmental time of both male and female T. euproctidis decreased with increasing temperature. Both males and females displayed a unimodal distribution for size, dry mass, and lipid content, with individuals at lower and higher temperatures being smaller, weighing less, and containing fewer lipids. Female lifetime fecundity increased from 13 to 24 °C and then decreased at 31 °C. Additionally, the number and size of gametes in male and female T. euproctidis displayed a unimodal distribution with increasing temperature. Trichogramma euproctidis deviates from the TSR as it follows a non‐linear reaction norm with an optimal developmental temperature. This result supports the hypothesis that for species following TSR and having unlimited access to food resources, the resource acquisition hypothesis is a significant mechanism explaining the TSR. With climate change affecting temperature, understanding the TSR is crucial, and research on insect parasitoids may help reveal how the interplay between environmental temperature and resource allocation affects the TSR in natural populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".