“I don’t want to follow the pack”: Canadian adolescents’ lived experiences of silence and quietude among friends and family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What are adolescents thinking and feeling during times of talking, listening, and being silent with their peers and family. Do their experiences differ according to context? How do such perceptions relate to one’s sense of identity and well-being over time? To answer such questions, the present small case 3-year longitudinal study explored a group of 6 Canadian 13-15 year old’s perceptions of self and their reflections on their communication experiences of talking, listening, and silence with their friends and family members. Participants shared their insight about how they described and understood themselves as a person, as well within social interactions with their friend and family. Results from a content analysis of responses showed nuanced differences across individual responses, but the themes were consistent. That is, across all 6 youth, they felt mixed emotions when silent, and happy when talking and listening to others, but felt unhappy and distressed when they knew that they were not being listened to. Results showed diverse conceptions and emotions about themselves as individuals across the three years. Such findings suggest a nuanced differentiation in terms of self-identity and relationships and communication with peers and family. These findings can inform how identity and communication are studied across adolescence and the development of future interventions to promote a positive and coherent sense of self and effective socio-communication skills
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".