MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392815451 · doi:10.1186/s40104-024-00996-8

Multi-omics integration identifies regulatory factors underlying bovine subclinical mastitis

2024· article· en· W4392815451 on OpenAlexafffund
Mengqi Wang, Naisu Yang, Mario Laterrière, David Gagné, Faith A. Omonijo, Eveline M. Ibeagha‐Awemu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsBiologySubclinical infectionMastitisEpigenomicsDNA methylationOmicsComputational biologyGeneticsGeneGene expressionMicrobiologyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mastitis caused by multiple factors remains one of the most common and costly disease of the dairy industry. Multi-omics approaches enable the comprehensive investigation of the complex interactions between multiple layers of information to provide a more holistic view of disease pathogenesis. Therefore, this study investigated the genomic and epigenomic signatures and the possible regulatory mechanisms underlying subclinical mastitis by integrating RNA sequencing data (mRNA and lncRNA), small RNA sequencing data (miRNA) and DNA methylation sequencing data of milk somatic cells from 10 healthy cows and 20 cows with naturally occurring subclinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus chromogenes. RESULTS: Functional investigation of the data sets through gene set analysis uncovered 3458 biological process GO terms and 170 KEGG pathways with altered activities during subclinical mastitis, provided further insights into subclinical mastitis and revealed the involvement of multi-omics signatures in the altered immune responses and impaired mammary gland productivity during subclinical mastitis. The abundant genomic and epigenomic signatures with significant alterations related to subclinical mastitis were observed, including 30,846, 2552, 1276 and 57 differential methylation haplotype blocks (dMHBs), differentially expressed genes (DEGs), lncRNAs (DELs) and miRNAs (DEMs), respectively. Next, 5 factors presenting the principal variation of differential multi-omics signatures were identified. The important roles of Factor 1 (DEG, DEM and DEL) and Factor 2 (dMHB and DEM), in the regulation of immune defense and impaired mammary gland functions during subclinical mastitis were revealed. Each of the omics within Factors 1 and 2 explained about 20% of the source of variation in subclinical mastitis. Also, networks of important functional gene sets with the involvement of multi-omics signatures were demonstrated, which contributed to a comprehensive view of the possible regulatory mechanisms underlying subclinical mastitis. Furthermore, multi-omics integration enabled the association of the epigenomic regulatory factors (dMHBs, DELs and DEMs) of altered genes in important pathways, such as 'Staphylococcus aureus infection pathway' and 'natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity pathway', etc., which provides further insights into mastitis regulatory mechanisms. Moreover, few multi-omics signatures (14 dMHBs, 25 DEGs, 18 DELs and 5 DEMs) were identified as candidate discriminant signatures with capacity of distinguishing subclinical mastitis cows from healthy cows. CONCLUSION: The integration of genomic and epigenomic data by multi-omics approaches in this study provided a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying subclinical mastitis and identified multi-omics candidate discriminant signatures for subclinical mastitis, which may ultimately lead to the development of more effective mastitis control and management strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnologySame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207