MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392817276 · doi:10.1002/vjch.202300279

Synthesis of magnesium hydroxide powder and dry powders for application in extinguishing petroleum fires

2024· article· en· W4392817276 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Giang H. Le, Dương Anh Thanh, Pham Thi My, Trang T. T. Pham, Trang T. T. Quan, Quan M. Nguyen, Quoc Anh Ngo

Bibliographic record

VenueVietnam Journal of Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire dynamics and safety research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPartenariat Canadien Contre Le CancerVietnam Academy of Science and Technology
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanoparticleMagnesiumAdsorptionHydroxideParticle sizeChemical engineeringChitosanNanocompositeComposite numberNuclear chemistryFourier transform infrared spectroscopyNanotechnologyMetallurgyComposite materialChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fire extinguishing agents are an important factor in the fight against fires. In this study, a new composite powder (CSPMS) was synthesized and used to extinguish fires caused by petroleum products. SiO 2 nanoparticles, Mg(OH) 2 nanoparticles, and nanocomposites of NH 4 H 2 PO 4 /chitosan (CSP) were combined to generate CSPMS powder. The structure and morphology of the material were characterized using methods such as XRD, SEM, FTIR, etc. The results showed that the synthesized Mg(OH) 2 nanoparticle size ranged from 20 to 30 nm, and the NH 4 H 2 PO 4 nanoparticle size ranged from 800 to 900 nm on the chitosan surface. The CSPMS material had particle sizes ranging from 2 to 3 µm, with a uniform distribution of SiO 2 nanoparticles (50–100 nm) and Mg(OH) 2 nanoparticles on the surface. The powdered materials were applied to extinguish gasoline and oil fires. CSPMS sample demonstrated the best fire extinguishing time and powder consumption (5.8 s and 12.2 g, respectively) and CO emission below the threshold of 400 ppm. Small‐scale fire extinguishing tests showed that CSPMS powder had better fire extinguishing capability, cooling time, and CO gas adsorption ability compared to commercial fire extinguishing powder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVietnam Journal of ChemistrySame topicFire dynamics and safety researchFrench-language works237,207