MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392818758 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0299854

The EvalUation of goal-diRected activities to prOmote well-beIng and heAlth (EUROIA) scale: Psychometric evaluation with Confirmatory Factor Analysis

2024· article· en· W4392818758 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Troy Francis, Rachel Peiris, Aleksandra Stanimirovic, Nicolette Stogios, Fatima Syed, Valeria E. Rac, Robert P. Nolan

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Education
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsConfirmatory factor analysisCronbach's alphaConstruct validityPsychologyScale (ratio)PsychometricsQuality of life (healthcare)Structural equation modelingClinical psychologyGerontologyMedicineApplied psychologyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: While state-based models of health-related quality of life (HRQL) are well-established in providing clinically relevant descriptions of HRQL status, they do not provide information on how to maintain or improve HRQL. The EvalUation of goal-diRected activities to prOmote well-beIng and heAlth (EUROIA), rooted in a novel process-based model of HRQL, measures goal-directed activities that are self-reported to promote HRQL as part of an individual's process of adapting to dynamic changes in health status. Our objectives were to condense and summarize the psychometric properties of the EUROIA by (i) defining and confirming its factor structure, (ii) evaluating its construct validity, and (iii) examining its internal consistency. METHODS: Principal component analysis was performed on the 18-item EUROIA to explore the underlying factor structure and condense the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the revised 14-item, 4-factor structure EUROIA instrument to evaluate the model fit. Data was obtained from adult participants with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure or advanced chronic kidney disease from 3 hospitals in Toronto, Canada. RESULTS: The revised 14-item EUROIA demonstrated 4 dimensions-Social Affiliation, fulfillment of Social Roles and Responsibilities, Self-Affirmation, and Eudaimonic Well-being-with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83, representing good internal consistency. Our confirmatory factor analysis final model achieved good overall model fit: (χ2 / df = 1.80; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.90; comparative fit index = 0.93; standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.06; root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.06). All items exhibited a factor loading greater than λ > 0.4 and p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The EUROIA holds clinical potential in its ability to provide informed feedback to patients on how they might maintain or modify their use of goal-directed activities to maintain and optimize perceived well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicDiabetes Management and Education→French-language works237,207→