Comparison of straight mini-plates vs. trapezoidal plates for internal fixation in condylar fractures: a systematic review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AMA Sulistyani LD, Julia V, Ramaditto Reksoprodjo M, Noor Dhewayani I, Utomo Suhandi H, Mahardika R. Comparison of straight mini-plates vs. trapezoidal plates for internal fixation in condylar fractures: a systematic review. Journal of Stomatology. 2024;77(1):63-70. doi:10.5114/jos.2024.136152. APA Sulistyani, L. D., Julia, V., Ramaditto Reksoprodjo, M., Noor Dhewayani, I., Utomo Suhandi, H., & Mahardika, R. (2024). Comparison of straight mini-plates vs. trapezoidal plates for internal fixation in condylar fractures: a systematic review. Journal of Stomatology, 77(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2024.136152 Chicago Sulistyani, Lilies D, Vera Julia, Muhammad Ramaditto Reksoprodjo, Intan Noor Dhewayani, Hendi Utomo Suhandi, and Raedi Mahardika. 2024. "Comparison of straight mini-plates vs. trapezoidal plates for internal fixation in condylar fractures: a systematic review". Journal of Stomatology 77 (1): 63-70. doi:10.5114/jos.2024.136152. Harvard Sulistyani, L., Julia, V., Ramaditto Reksoprodjo, M., Noor Dhewayani, I., Utomo Suhandi, H., and Mahardika, R. (2024). Comparison of straight mini-plates vs. trapezoidal plates for internal fixation in condylar fractures: a systematic review. Journal of Stomatology, 77(1), pp.63-70. https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2024.136152 MLA Sulistyani, Lilies et al. "Comparison of straight mini-plates vs. trapezoidal plates for internal fixation in condylar fractures: a systematic review." Journal of Stomatology, vol. 77, no. 1, 2024, pp. 63-70. doi:10.5114/jos.2024.136152. Vancouver Sulistyani L, Julia V, Ramaditto Reksoprodjo M, Noor Dhewayani I, Utomo Suhandi H, Mahardika R. Comparison of straight mini-plates vs. trapezoidal plates for internal fixation in condylar fractures: a systematic review. Journal of Stomatology. 2024;77(1):63-70. doi:10.5114/jos.2024.136152.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it