Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 16 papers published in this Special Technical Publication (STP) underwent a rigorous peer-review process and were published electronically prior to the printing of this book in the Journal of ASTM International. The ISSS was founded under the leadership of Ejnar Eriksson, M.D., of Stockholm, Sweden, after the first World Congress on Skiing Safety that occurred in Riksgränsen, Sweden, in 1974. The first official ISSS congress was held three years later in 1977 in the Sierra Nevada of Spain. Since then, the meetings have been held biennially at or near a ski resort in many parts of the world. The congress has been held at the following sites: Queenstown, New Zealand in 1979; Bormio, Italy in 1981; Keystone, Colorado, USA in 1983; Naeba, Japan in 1985; Chamonix, France in 1987; Riksgränsen, Sweden for a second time in 1989; Thredbo, Australia in 1991; Zell am Zee, Austria in 1993; Voss, Norway in 1995; Whistler/Blackcomb, British Columbia, Canada in 1997; Breuil Cervinia, Italy in 1999; Queenstown, New Zealand in 2001; St. Moritz/Pontresina, Switzerland in 2003; Arai, Niigata, Japan in 2005; Aviemore, Scotland in 2007; and Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, in 2009. The planning for the 2011 meeting to be held in Keystone, Colorado, USA, for a second time is well under way. The congress will be held from May 1–7, 2011. It will be chaired by the president of the ISSS, Rick Greenwald, Ph.D., and Irving Scher, Ph.D.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.855 | 0.567 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".