MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392852686 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.03.006

Does Disopyramide Still Have a Place in the Management of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy?

2024· review· en· W4392852686 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stéphanie Corriveau, Bobak Heydari, Patrick Garceau

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversité de MontréalBristol-Myers Squibb (Canada)
FundersMedtronicBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsDisopyramideMedicineHypertrophic cardiomyopathyObstructive cardiomyopathyCardiologyCardiomyopathyIntensive care medicineHeart failureVentricular outflow tract obstructionSudden cardiac deathInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a relatively common inherited cardiac disorder associated with a left ventricular hypertrophy that cannot be explained by another cardiac or systemic disorder. One of the core pathophysiology features is left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (obstructive HCM [oHCM]), and this pathology could lead to complications, including sudden cardiac death and heart failure. Current treatment strategies for symptomatic oHCM consist of historical pharmacologic agents that are often based on nonrandomized, limited data or expert opinion. This article presents a critical appraisal of disopyramide, one of the pharmacologic options available in Canada for managing oHCM. The author concludes that robust clinical evidence supporting the use of disopyramide in treating oHCM is lacking, and that disopyramide should be reserved as a last resort for nonresponders to pharmacologic treatment and for those in whom invasive therapies are not indicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207